Your AI programme is not stalled. Your data is.
Every model, dashboard and agent inherits whatever state your masters are in. We fix that, prove it is fixed, and keep it fixed — with rules your own business users can write and read.
Why quality decays after every cleanup
Nobody is measured on it
The masters were never really resolved
AI made it urgent
What the programme covers
Rules and continuous monitoring
Master data stewardship
Cataloguing and lineage
Access governance and audit readiness
Governance platform implementation
Measurement is the product
Most data-quality work is sold as a cleanup. A cleanup is a project with an end date, and quality starts decaying the day it finishes. We sell the standing score instead: per domain, with an owner, visible, so decay is something you can see happening rather than discover.
Where this has run
Home Depot
SiteOne
Three common entry points
An AI initiative that stalled
An audit or compliance deadline
A merger
What this unlocks
Three ways to buy this
Decision Sprint
Six weeks, fixed scope, one decision domain. You get a working pack running in shadow mode and a measured read on what it is worth before you commit to more.
Managed pod
A standing Iksula team that runs the layer for you — owns the exceptions, the adoption and the outcome, not just the uptime.
Transformation programme
Outcome-based, where the scope is a business result rather than a deliverable list.
Frequently asked questions
We did a data cleanup two years ago. Why is it bad again?
Because nobody was measured on keeping it clean. That is not a criticism of your team — it is what happens when quality is a project rather than a standing score with an owner. Continuous per-domain scoring is the specific thing that stops the cycle.
Can our own people write the rules?
Yes, and they should. The people who know what a correct product record looks like are rarely the people who write SQL. A no-code rule builder is not a convenience feature here — it is what makes the rules stay current after we leave.
Is this the same as buying a governance platform?
No. We implement platforms where they fit, Microsoft Purview in particular, but a platform is a place to record decisions, not a substitute for making them. The work is the stewardship, the rules, and the owner.
How do we know it is working?
You get a score per domain, continuously, with a name against it. That is the deliverable. If the score cannot go down visibly, nobody is really measuring it.
Where should we start?
With an audit of one domain — usually product or supplier, because that is where the pain shows first. It is short and fixed-price, and it tells you what the rest of the programme should be, including whether there is one.
Start with one decision
Tell us the decision your team argues about most, and we will tell you what it would take to make it once, properly, on the data you already have.
Connect with our experts
DJ Basumatari
Chief Executive Officer
Abhishek Jain
Director - Solutions & Innovation
